mccauley at ecn.purdue.edu
Wed Jun 30 14:15:25 EDT 1993
"Tom Meixner" (tom at hwr.arizona.edu) writes on 30 Jun 93:
> Of course after the maps have been digitized the boundaries do not
>match exactly. Until now we have been using mask and a short script to match
>the two maps boundaries and to expand any delineations to the new map edge.
> I was wondering if there was any more precise and standardized way of
>conducting this matching of basin boundaries or if the method we currently
>use is as good as things get.
this info doesn't do you much good now, but for others' benefit:
whenever possible, trying to digitize the boundary of something first.
Then, g.copy this file and try to register it before you begin
a new set of features. E.g., Texas has boundaries that I would not
want to digitize more than once:
More information about the grass-user