Monitor colors
Jonathan L Deenik
jdeenik at uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
Mon Aug 8 15:41:11 EDT 1994
Thanks for the reply martijn,
I checked the dat using "r.cats". It appears that all the bands have been
reduced somehow. In xV, I notice that I can put a check in the box
labelled "save at normal size". Do I want to do that? Also, when I try to
save the images in the greyscale mode, I fail as the images appear to be
saved automatically and unchangeably in the 32 color mode. As far as I
can tell, it is at this juncture that my problems arise. Why won't xV
allow me to save to the greyscale mode?
Thanks for your patience!
Jonathan
On Sun, 7 Aug 1994 martijn at scanner.frw.uva.nl wrote:
> One other reason for Grass images to contain less greyscale values than
> they should is that they really do. That is, you either never had 256
> different values in the image or you lost them during import/conversion
> procedures. The first thing to do is to query your Grass image using
> "r.cats" to find out if there really are only 31 values left. If this
> proves true, and you're POSITIVE that the original image contained more
> different values than that, you must have lost them somewhere. This means
> you have to check every step along the way. Hopefully you will discover
> that you inadvertently resampled the image - the `save at original size'
> checkbox in Xv comes to mind as a plausible cause.
>
> P. Martijn van Leusen
> Institute of Prehistory, University of Amsterdam martijn at scanner.frw.uva.nl
>
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list