g.setproj, r.proj, rant about s.surf.**

Brad Robbins (BIO) brobbins at chuma.cas.usf.edu
Mon Aug 29 07:36:21 EDT 1994


Have you given any thought to how you might deal with the inherent 
problems of nearest neighbor techniques when dealing with non-point data?


Brad Robbins						Dept. of Biology
brobbins at chuma.cas.usf.edu				Univ. of South Florida


On Mon, 29 Aug 1994, Simon Cox wrote:

> >>But I think the fact
> >>that there is not a fast bilinear or nearest neighbour s.surf.*** program
> >>is a serious deficiency in GRASS's armory.

> Yeah - for categorical values you definitely need nearest neighbour - I
> mentioned this too ...  Maybe s.surf.tps with npmin=1 ???  (Silly, I know,
> but might be quicker than the alternatives).
> 
> ____
> __________________________________________________________________
> Dr Simon Cox                             __  L
> CSIRO Exploration & Mining            ,~'  L_|\       Australian
> 39 Fairway, PO Box 437,            ;-'         \      Geodynamics
> Nedlands, WA  6009,  Australia     (            \     Cooperative
>       Phone +61 9 389 8421         +    ___     /     Research
>       Fax   +61 9 389 1906          L~~'   "\__/      Centre
> s.cox at dem.csiro.au                            7
> __________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 




More information about the grass-user mailing list