g.setproj, r.proj, rant about s.surf.**
Brad Robbins (BIO)
brobbins at chuma.cas.usf.edu
Mon Aug 29 07:36:21 EDT 1994
Have you given any thought to how you might deal with the inherent
problems of nearest neighbor techniques when dealing with non-point data?
Brad Robbins Dept. of Biology
brobbins at chuma.cas.usf.edu Univ. of South Florida
On Mon, 29 Aug 1994, Simon Cox wrote:
> >>But I think the fact
> >>that there is not a fast bilinear or nearest neighbour s.surf.*** program
> >>is a serious deficiency in GRASS's armory.
> Yeah - for categorical values you definitely need nearest neighbour - I
> mentioned this too ... Maybe s.surf.tps with npmin=1 ??? (Silly, I know,
> but might be quicker than the alternatives).
>
> ____
> __________________________________________________________________
> Dr Simon Cox __ L
> CSIRO Exploration & Mining ,~' L_|\ Australian
> 39 Fairway, PO Box 437, ;-' \ Geodynamics
> Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia ( \ Cooperative
> Phone +61 9 389 8421 + ___ / Research
> Fax +61 9 389 1906 L~~' "\__/ Centre
> s.cox at dem.csiro.au 7
> __________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list