xgrass

N.Thirugnanasothy at bradford.ac.uk N.Thirugnanasothy at bradford.ac.uk
Thu Mar 16 08:08:47 EST 1995


> From grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil Thu Mar 16 13:01:14 1995
> From: Grass package <grass at sun1.bham.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: xgrass
> Sender: grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil
> Reply-To: grassu-list at max.cecer.army.mil
> To: grassu-list at max.cecer.army.mil
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 11:03:15 +0000 (GMT)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type> : > text/plain> ; > charset=US-ASCII> 
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 965
> 
> > I notice a lot of (new?) users are going for the xgrass interface onto
> > grass.  My understanding was that development (& support?) for xgrass had
> > stopped in favour of LAS tcltkgrass.  However, tcltkgrass has still not
> > made its official debut ... or has it?  Can someone elucidate, and then the
> > poor souls struggling with xgrass will know whether their's is wasted
> > effort, in the long run?
> > 
> > (btw - I tried xgrass briefly, but missed the flexibility of the
> > command-line interface, so rapidly reverted!)



More information about the grass-user mailing list