postscript output
Malcolm Williamson
malcolm at cast.uark.edu
Mon Feb 10 16:12:17 EST 1997
Hi, David
I assume that your problem is with vector data. What update of GRASS are
you using? There was a fix to ps.map that should solve your problem; I'm
not sure if it is separately available on the moon or not. If you are
running pre-Update 5, I suggest getting and installing the latest version
of GRASS.
-Malcolm
--
Malcolm D. Williamson - GIS Specialist E-mail: malcolm at cast.uark.edu
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies Telephone: (501) 575-6159
Ozark Rm. 12 Fax: (501) 575-5218
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72701
On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, David L. Certain wrote:
> Dear GRASS Users,
>
> I recently posted a message asking for help with a problem I am having printing
> a postscript file created with ps.map. Thanks to those of you who responded.
> Progresss is being made. I now know a little more about my problem and would
> like you to consider the following situation: When printing my .ps file using
> the entire region of my study, my output is jumbled and mostly unrecognizable
> (e.g. polygons are not closed and are out of place, lines are disjointed,
> etc.). As I print from smaller and smaller regions of my study area (using
> d.zoom to specify a new region and re-running ps.map) the output gets closer
> and closer to a coordinated image. Finally, when I reach a certain region size
> (scale?) everything comes out juuuuust right. Why can't I get good output when
> printing from the whole region? For those of you that missed my last message
> it may be important to know that I am using an x,y coordinate system. Any
> suggestions would again be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> David L. Certain
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Oklahoma Biological Survey
> 111 Chesapeake St.
> Norman, OK 73019
> (405)325-7598/fax (405)325-7702
> dcertain at obsnsrv1.bio.uoknor.edu
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list