e00 output

[David D Gray]

Michel Wurtz - ENGEES/CEREG wrote:
> 
> David D Gray wrote:
> [...]
> > with the `giants'.(As Alejandro has just pointed out) But surely all
> > the serious topological formats - DLG, dig, e00, SDTS even, are
> > much-of-a-muchness under the skin, I mean in terms of their data
> > structures and links. So I am not quite sure what you mean by using
> 
> Hmm, for those interested, I have a beta (or probably an omega :-)
> version of v.out.e00 for grass5.0. (s.out.e00 is in the distrib)
> I resist Markus because I think the actual version is not useable,
> but if there is peoples interested in testing, I will work again
> on it and release a (bugged) version tomorrow.
> Since I don't have any ESRI product, I don't know how to test the
> output of the program (it's ascii, however, so it may be fixed
> with vi or emacs ;-)
> 
> --
> Michel Wurtz    ENGEES - CEREG
>                 1, quai Koch - BP 1039, F-67070 STRASBOURG cedex
>                 Tel: +33 03.88.24.82.45  Fax: +33 03.88.37.04.97

Michel

Did I get this right? In my remarks I intended to say that, all
these formats are different models for recording the same
topological entities and relationships between them - *broadly*
corresponding to the SDTS TVP. From my reading of e00.txt analysis
file, it seems that e00 is also one of these - ie. a `topological'
format, not a `geometric' one like shapefile or MI?

David