[GRASSLIST:5003] Re: Considerations for SVG 1.1 spec from W3C

[BABA Yoshihiko]

Jack Varga wrote:
> I couldn't help but notice that no one with a geospatial
> background is involved in authoring the emerging
> Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) specification from
> W3C.  On the surface, it would seem that GRASS
> represents one of the premier opportunities for implementing
> SVG for both reading in and writing out vector data.
> But short of considerations for geospatial data (i.e.,
> projection system integration), it would appear the
> geospatial community is missing a golden opportunity.  Any thoughts on 
> this from the GRASS community?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-SVG11-20020430/
> 
> Jack Varga
> Boulder, CO

Not GRASS related, but there are many GIS projects that use SVG.  For 
example,

http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs/02-009/GML2-11.html
http://freegis.org/search.en.html?search=svg

-- 
BABA Yoshihiko