[GRASSLIST:5009] Re: Considerations for SVG 1.1 spec from W3C
Jack Varga
jvarga at boulder.net
Wed Nov 20 11:21:39 EST 2002
There's nothing that says that it can't be an exchange format, but I wasn't
thinking along the lines of sdts or shape. Instead a data to screen and
screen
to data exchange format, although granted I haven't read through the spec
thoroughly enough to determine if it would support the latter.
The pixel to real-world coordinates is one of the major missing pieces
(IMO) of browser based mapping. Granted, the support has to be in the
browser, but I believe that's coming and the SVG spec could help
speed that along.
Just my $0.02
-jv
Glynn Clements wrote:
>SVG isn't a "vector exchange format"; it's a vector-based graphics
>format. Its closest competitors are Macromedia Flash, PostScript and
>PDF.
>
>SVG may well be a suitable output format, in the sense that we might
>wish to produce a v.out.svg utility, or an SVG driver (analogous to
>the PNG driver), or something similar to ps.map but using SVG instead
>of PostScript.
>
>It isn't appropriate as a storage format. It might be worthwhile
>attempting to produce a tool which will extract geographic vector data
>from an SVG file. However, such a task would inevitably be just as
>complex and unreliable as extracting such data from e.g. PostScript or
>PDF files.
>
>
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list