[GRASSLIST:3310] Re: GRASS 5.0.3 problem

[Paul Kelly]

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Thomas Adams wrote:

> Glynn,
>
> I'll heed your advice. At this point would I be better off going to
> GRASS 5.3 (which I understand is still under development)

IMHO being under development is a good point as it means bugs are being
fixed. I would highly recommend to use 5.3.

I said to Helena that if no-one else does, on 15 May I will tag the CVS
head and prepare a 5.3.0 source code release containing the content of the
CVS head as of that day.

Paul