[GRASSLIST:7163] Re: length restriction on raster names?
glynn at gclements.plus.com
Wed Jun 15 07:49:18 EDT 2005
[CC'd to developers' list]
Vincent Schut wrote:
> is there a length restriction on GRASS raster names, especially when
> used in an imaginary group? I have several rasters with quite long names
> (like: '20020101_20030101_normalized_min'). I can access these fine, but
> when I add them to a group, this doesn't work and the REF file of the
> group seems garbage: the raster names looks like they have been cut at
> something around 20 characters. Is this intentional?
Looking at the imagery.h header, I notice:
char name; /* length is not in sync with other definitions */
That suggests that map names are limited to 30 bytes (29 bytes plus a
There isn't a global setting for the maximum length of a map name
(although there probably should be). I note that "struct Reclass"
allows for 50 bytes. Other code which allocates fixed-sized buffers
for map names commonly allocates 100, 256 or 512 bytes (the last one
is likely to exceed the maximum length of a filename on most operating
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
More information about the grass-user