[GRASS-user] cva run time
gary
lists at lazygranch.com
Mon Jul 24 04:56:32 EDT 2006
Per Hamish's suggestion, I have resampled the raster map until I could
get an output from r.cva. I had to reduce the resolution by a factor of
8. I don't want to interrupt the run, but that should be around 800x300
or so cells.
The output of the "sites" CVA was a solid yellow image, which I assume
means everything was seen. I replaced "type=sites" with "type=all" and
am rerunning at the moment.
Paul Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, gary wrote:
>
>> I was hoping that setting max_dist to be small would reduce the data.
>> Otherwise, I need to figure out how to truncate my DEM.
>
>
> Ha ha no I remember from my experiences with r.los several years ago
> that the code performed the calculation anyway, then at the last minute
> checked if the point was within the max distance and if not discarded
> the result!! So max_dist doesn't affect the processing time at all and
> really just operates as a mask that you could create anyway afterwards
> with r.mapcalc if you needed it.
>
> There is a fairly promising fast algorithm available that someone with
> an interest in the subject and good C programming skills could check out:
> A fast algorithm for approximate viewshed computation
> David Izraelevitz (TEC/Eng. Res. and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps
> of Engineers, SRI International)
> Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v 69, n 7, Jul 1, 2003,
> pp 767-774
> Would be a lot of work though to do it well.
>
> Paul
>
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list