[GRASS-user] differences between GDAL Grass built-in support
and GDAL-Grass plugin
Paul Kelly
paul-grass at stjohnspoint.co.uk
Wed Jul 9 07:04:33 EDT 2008
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Benjamin Ducke wrote:
> Does that mean that circular dependency has finally been dropped?
> Unless one really needs r.out.gdal.sh?
Well, you might want GDAL to be able to read GRASS datasets outside GRASS
for other purposes - this was possible long before r.out.gdal.sh came into
being and is the primary purpose of the GRASS support in GDAL as far as I
understand it.
But as Martin said speaking from a GRASS point of view, GRASS does not
need GDAL to be compiled with GRASS support or to have a GDAL-GRASS plugin
enabled.
Paul
More information about the grass-user
mailing list