[GRASS-user] differences between GDAL Grass built-in support and GDAL-Grass plugin

[Benjamin Ducke]

Martin, Paul:

Terrific.
Thanks for the update.

Ben

Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2008/7/9 Benjamin Ducke <benjamin.ducke at oxfordarch.co.uk>:
>> Does that mean that circular dependency has finally been dropped?
>> Unless one really needs r.out.gdal.sh?
> 
> yes, I would guess so (GRASS >= 6.3)
> 
>> How about OGR?
> 
> Both the modules (v.in/out.ogr) are written in C. GDAL with GRASS
> support not needed here.
> 
> Martin
> 


-- 
Benjamin Ducke
Senior Applications Support and Development Officer

Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited
Janus House
Osney Mead
OX2 0ES
Oxford, U.K.

Tel: +44 (0)1865 263 800 (switchboard)
Tel: +44 (0)1865 980 758 (direct)
Fax :+44 (0)1865 793 496
benjamin.ducke at oxfordarch.co.uk




------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.