[GRASS-user] concurrent versions of grass
Vincent Bain
bain at toraval.fr
Thu Apr 2 03:37:59 EDT 2009
Thank you, I'll try it
VB
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 22:53 +0200, Markus Neteler a écrit :
> Unless you don't use GEM then you are fine to remove/rename it.
>
> Markus
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Vincent Bain <bain at toraval.fr> wrote:
> > In my case, what if I voluntarily remove gem6 before installing a second
> > version of Grass ? will the previous grass install be damaged ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 22:28 +0200, Markus Neteler a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Vincent Bain <bain at toraval.fr> wrote:
> >> > Perhaps,
> >> >
> >> > but it could be interesting to check whether the error is reproductible,
> >>
> >> Yes: because in all GRASS 6 versions it is called gem6 (unfortunately).
> >> So it must conflict...
> >> If the others agree I'll start to add the second version number starting
> >> with GRASS 6.5. Then behaviour doesn't change for 6.4.
> >>
> >> Markus
> >>
> >
> >
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list