[GRASS-user] Correctly Converting LL to LCC
Rich Shepard
rshepard at appl-ecosys.com
Tue Dec 29 12:33:44 EST 2009
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Glynn Clements wrote:
> Do you end up with feet? Or do you end up with metres but you're comparing
> against a reference given in feet? Your previous comment suggests the
> latter:
Glynn, et al.:
I think that this time I have it right.
Created a new location with the projection information based on a .prj
file (for the hydrologic basins) and imported that map. When I look at
PROJ_UNITS I see they are in feet:
unit: Foot
units: Feet
meters: 0.3048
This leaves me with a question about the PROJ_INFO contents:
name: Lambert Conformal Conic
proj: lcc
datum: nad83
ellps: grs80
lat_1: 43
lat_2: 45.5
lat_0: 41.75
lon_0: -120.5
x_0: 399999.9999999999
y_0: 0
no_defs: defined
nadgrids: WO
The x_0 value seems to be in meters (in earlier locations it was rounded
up to 400000) rather than feet. Will this cause me problems if I continue to
re-import into the new location and integrate all maps?
After running 'g.region vect=basins' and 'g.region -p' I see:
projection: 99 (Lambert Conformal Conic)
zone: 0
datum: nad83
ellipsoid: grs80
north: 1683494.51666667
south: 4017.2
west: 222006.05
east: 2367279.85
nsres: 1.00000019
ewres: 0.99999991
rows: 1679477
cols: 2145274
cells: 3602938341698
The rows, cols, and cells seem extra large. This is a vector map so it
probably doesn't matter, but I'll be re-importing the DEM where it will
matter. Should I also clean up the resolution so both values are exactly
1.0?
Thanks,
Rich
More information about the grass-user
mailing list