[GRASS-user] A problem with i.gensigset.
Nikos Alexandris
nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de
Tue Apr 6 11:33:52 EDT 2010
(sorry for re-sorting the message, just to keep it easy to follow-up)
joel dinis:
> > I trying to classify remote sensing imagery, and
> > I thought to try the i.smap module, but
> > when I run the i.gensigset,
Nikos Alexandris:
> Please, could you copy-paste the exact command you used?
> Does the "maxsig=" (e.g. maxsig=20) make any difference?
joel dinis:
> In fact, I put maxsig=30.
> i.gensigset trainingmap=amostras group=grupo subgroup=subgrupo
> signaturefile=assinaturas maxsig=30
What about smaller maxsig's, like:
- maxsig=25
- maxsig=20
- maxsig=15
?
Nikos
>
> > I always
> > get the same problem:
> > ...
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (9 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (8 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (7 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (6 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (5 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (4 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (3 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (2 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (1 remain)
> > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> clusters
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (-1 remain)
> > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> clusters
> > Number of subclasses is 0
> > Clustering class 12 (184 pixels)...
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (9 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (8 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (7 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (6 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (5 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (4 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (3 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (2 remain)
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (1 remain)
> > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> clusters
> > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (-1 remain)
> > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> clusters
> > Number of subclasses is 0
> > i.gensigset complete.
> >
> > And afterwards the signature file doesn't have any
> > spectral information. I really don't understand whats
> happening
> > and the cause to this outcome.
> >
> > Can anyone solve this "enigma"?
> >
> > Ps: I don't know if this information is important: I
> collected
> > about 450 samples distributed by 10 classes. I may also
> > add that the average number of pixels per sample is around
> 50.
> >
> > And thanks list, for the previous tips: they were very
> useful.
More information about the grass-user
mailing list