[GRASS-user] A problem with i.gensigset.
Nikos Alexandris
nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de
Tue Apr 6 11:38:49 EDT 2010
joel dinis:
> > In fact, I put maxsig=30.
> > i.gensigset trainingmap=amostras group=grupo subgroup=subgrupo
> > signaturefile=assinaturas maxsig=30
NikosA:
> What about smaller maxsig's, like:
>
> - maxsig=25
> - maxsig=20
> - maxsig=15
and even smaller than 10 perhaps since the algorithm indicates "9
remain" after the first removal.
Are the "sub-signature removals of the same amount for all classes"?
Nikos
> > > I always
> > > get the same problem:
> > > ...
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (9 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (8 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (7 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (6 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (5 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (4 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (3 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (2 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (1 remain)
> > > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> > clusters
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (-1 remain)
> > > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> > clusters
> > > Number of subclasses is 0
> > > Clustering class 12 (184 pixels)...
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (9 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (8 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (7 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (6 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (5 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (4 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (3 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (2 remain)
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (1 remain)
> > > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> > clusters
> > > Removed a singular subsignature number 1 (-1 remain)
> > > Unreliable clustering. Try a smaller initial number of
> > clusters
> > > Number of subclasses is 0
> > > i.gensigset complete.
> > >
> > > And afterwards the signature file doesn't have any
> > > spectral information. I really don't understand whats
> > happening
> > > and the cause to this outcome.
> > >
> > > Can anyone solve this "enigma"?
> > >
> > > Ps: I don't know if this information is important: I
> > collected
> > > about 450 samples distributed by 10 classes. I may also
> > > add that the average number of pixels per sample is around
> > 50.
> > >
> > > And thanks list, for the previous tips: they were very
> > useful.
More information about the grass-user
mailing list