[GRASS-user] r.le or r.li?
neteler at osgeo.org
Fri Mar 26 17:27:07 EDT 2010
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:39 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm doing some patch stats analysis (largest patch, edge and interior
> patches). There are meta modules available in grass r.le and r.li.
> The seem to provide similar set of patch statistics calculations. I
> want to know the basic difference of the two. r.li seems to be very
> similar to fragstats or is it?
The differences: r.le is the first implementation but unmaintained.
r.li is a new implementation and somewhat maintained (just fixed
a bug today). Hopefully more indices are added in future.
> Follow up inquiry, how do I include the the patch stats to a vector
> polygon? For example, I have a watershed polygon and landcover
> raster. I want to include as an attribute, the largest interior patch
> within each sub-basin.
... sorry, no idea. In any case "think raster" for this module family...
More information about the grass-user