[GRASS-user] overlapping areas seem valid to v.build: why?
giohappy at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 16:10:18 EST 2011
Back again with my topological questions :)
Two overlapping polygons were imported without cleaning them (-c option in
The result are two overlapping areas, correctly built from two overlapping
boundaries and their centroids.
If I run v.build to output topological errors, the output is empty. I
deduce that the overlapping areas are topologically correct, but the GRASS
topological model states that two boundaries *should* not overlap.
Question: Is the *should* proposition a suggestions or a rule to state
boundary/area validity? From my simple test, it seems that the two areas
overlap but yet they're correctly built (level = 2).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the grass-user