[GRASS-user] grass prompt default working directory

[Nikos Alexandris]

Vaclav Petras wrote:
..
> >> > 2) Probably, we need a template "Main article: XXX". ...considering
> >> > the article "Working with GRASS without starting it explicitly" which
> >> > should be referenced also from "GRASS and Shell". (I added the link in
> >> > semi-wikipedia style, so you can see, if you like the style. The usage
> >> > of template on Wikipedia looks like this "{{main|Anonymous
> >> > function#C++}}".)

> >> >http://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_and_Shell#Automated_batch_jobs:
> >> >_Setting_the_GRASS_environmental_variables

Nikos A:
> > And, maybe it's not that easy, but what do you think of a bi-directional
> > behaviour?

> > The template, not only should add a reference to the main article/page, it
> > should also add automatically a link in the main page itself, something
> > alike a mini Table of sub-articles?  This might mix things with the "See
> > also" user- scratched sections!

> > What do you think?  Possible?  Will re-search next-week.

> > Of course, there is the "What links here" function (standard menu on the
> > left).  Maybe just stay on this and use it, and simply try to make it more
> > obvious -- it's something that does not catch my eye!

Vaclav Petras wrote:
 
> Yes, even if this "bi-directional behaviour" sounds strange our wiki
> needs some more (inter-)links. From my POV, there can be "See also"
> and "What links here" sections. (I would ignore the possible
> duplication of links if it is caused by a system. Writing something
> twice would be bad, this not.)

I agree with your Skepsis. It charges me -- once a bit relaxed after this and 
the next week, I'll try to more time on this -- at least, to search and demo 
the options.

> (Speaking about wiki, exploring and criticizing of the proposed CSS is
> is still on my todo list.)

This is something that I would like at least to have it discussed -- sooner or 
later, it doesn't matter.  It's worth the effort to "assess" it before it gets 
"forgotten".  I think we only need to find some "free-time" :D

Thank you for sharing your invaluable view on this.
Best, N
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20130227/7dccbce4/attachment.pgp>