[GRASS-user] r.horizon and negative tilt
balotti.and at gmail.com
balotti.and at gmail.com
Mon Jul 30 02:18:01 PDT 2018
Il 30/07/2018 09:24, Frank David ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea,
> Thanks for your message. But what is the ground plane ? r.horizon use
> the topography, so nothing is plane (and the earth curvature tends to
> lower the ground).
Yes, what you explain below is what I mean with "ground plane".
> I guess as the calculation is done at ground level, the minimum
> viewable horizon cannot be lower than zero. The calculation should be
> done higher than ground level to "see" negatives horizon.
Have you taken a look to r.viewshed? I never tried it but maybe is
useful for your purposes.
> Never mind I will try to create my own r.horizon with r.transect or
> r.profile.
> Best regards,
> Frank
Best regards,
Andrea
> Le 30/07/2018 à 08:47, balotti.and at gmail.com a écrit :
>> Hi Frank,
>> just my opinion but r.horizon I suppose is targeted to solar
>> radiation modules and because of that returns only the line-of-sight
>> "obstacles" above the ground plane, where direct sunlight may be
>> obstructed by obstacles.
>> best regards,
>>
>> Andrea Balotti
>>
>> Il 28/07/2018 15:59, Frank David ha scritto:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> It seems that r.horizon in does not return negative heights. How
>>> it's possible in case of the given point from the calculation is
>>> done is located on mountain and the horizon around is below zero ??.
>>> I miss something may be...
>>>
>>> Thank you for your explanations
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Frank
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20180730/a25dddde/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list