[GRASS-user] r.sun - beam irradiance issues in mountain area with a high relief energy
Helmut Kudrnovsky
hellik at web.de
Tue Jan 31 12:51:41 PST 2023
hi,
given a a mountain area with a high relief energy based upon an ALS DEM with a 1x1m resolution
and system: winGRASS GIS 8.2.1
g.region -p
projection: 99 (MGI / Austria Lambert)
zone: 0
datum: hermannskogel
ellipsoid: bessel
north: 358599.5
south: 345055.5
west: 221323.5
east: 236275.5
nsres: 1
ewres: 1
rows: 13544
cols: 14952
cells: 202509888
DEM range of data: min = 1197.4 max = 3496.68
the horizon rasters are calculated by
r.horizon elevation=als at data step=30 maxdistance=5000 output=horangle
r.sun is calculated for 15 June
r.sun elevation=als at data aspect=als_aspect at data slope=als_slope at data horizon_basename=horangle horizon_step=30 beam_rad=beam_rad166 day=166 nprocs=2 npartitions=2
see the result screenshot in https://pasteboard.co/YShtdFG8C7jk.png
o the high peak has northern, eastern and southern oriented steep slopes
o the more red, the higher beam irradiance calculated by the r.sun command above
o the southern oriented footslopes show a high beam irradiance (as exptected)
o the southern oriented and very steep slopes around the peak show a similar low beam irradiance as the northern slopes (not expected)
I have issues to interpret the results, especially the last pattern:
o Could be the lower beam irradiance in the very southern oriented slopes nearby the peak due to the very steep slope?
o Do slopes with a high inclination (though southern oriented) reduce beam irradiance in the implemented model?
Kind regards
Helmut
More information about the grass-user
mailing list