[Ica-osgeo-labs] Geo for all - logo

[Jeremy Morley]

The essential thing on a map-based design is that it is for All. Too often for example New Zealand goes missing as a cartographic expediency!

--
Jeremy Morley
Theme Leader, Geospatial Science
Nottingham Geospatial Institute
University of Nottingham
jeremy.morley at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:jeremy.morley at nottingham.ac.uk>


On 28 Mar 2015, at 15:32, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) <patrick.hogan at nasa.gov<mailto:patrick.hogan at nasa.gov>> wrote:


Great work on the logos! Anyone of them is a winner, except for maybe 4, just not enough sense of we’re in this 'together.’



I also think the rainbow effect is worth preserving in whatever logo is finally selected.



On Logo 3, it would be nice to see a little more curvature to the arms and not duplicate the same color for a 'humanoid' as the earth (green). Would like to see the rainbow working here on the 'humanoids.'



7 and 10 are fun too, but we need to see more Europe and Africa (and Asia) on 10, and maybe a bigger Earth and drop that extra ring around the Earth.



I like 8 too, but with green lat/long, blue arrow-heads, more oval-shape to the humanoid heads, and two more humanoids (for five instead of three).



-Patrick


From: ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Marco Minghini
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 8:19 AM
To: Jeff McKenna
Cc: ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [Ica-osgeo-labs] Geo for all - logo

+1 for #3.
Marco

Marco Minghini, Ph.D.
GEO Laboratory, Politecnico di Milano - Como Campus
via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como (Italy)
+39 031 3327540
marco.minghini at polimi.it<mailto:marco.minghini at polimi.it>
@MarcoMinghini

2015-03-28 16:13 GMT+01:00 Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com<mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>>:
I also like #3 too...I was torn between 3 and 10.  I would be happy with #3.

-jeff



On 2015-03-28 11:32 AM, Jeremy Morley wrote:
I like the third: inclusive, will work well in monochrome too, oriented away from the compass points too so no issues of North/South divides etc.

_______________________________________________
ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs

_______________________________________________
ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/attachments/20150328/69d3abf6/attachment.html>