[Incubator] Propose FDO for Incubation

[Robert Bray]

All,

Changed the subject since we have gone down this path...

Long term I would really like to run MapGuide and FDO as separate
projects (and they are already separated by infrastructure). So, I would
like get FDO into the incubation process. What's the best approach for
that, should I send a completed copy of the application form questions
to the list and put forth a motion for vote?

Thanks,
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Warmerdam [mailto:fwarmerdam at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 7:46 PM
To: incubator at incubator.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Incubator] New Mentor for MapGuide

Mark Lucas wrote:
> I'd agree if they are completely separate, but if they are
collaborating 
> and use some of the same people there may be advantages to rolling it 
> under an existing project.  This is essentially what we are doing with

> osgPlanet under OSSIM.  Probably 90% of our new development is going 
> into osgPlanet driving some enhancements to the OSSIM baseline in the 
> process.  Personally, I'd like to see more integration between various

> activities.  It will make it less of a tower of Babel when
users/members 
> come looking for solutions.

Mark / Cameron / Bob,

One distinction I think is that osgPlanet is essentially the same
developers as OSSIM.  osgPlanet can, to some degree, be consider an
example application on the OSSIM tool chain.

Whereas I believe the FDO and MapGuide development teams are
quite distinct though they obviously work reasonably closely.  For
instance FDO and MapGuide have distinct release cycles.  They are also
each quite substantial code bases.   A quick count shows 140KLOC
for the FDO core along for instance (not counting any of the
format providers).

My general feeling is that I wouldn't mind a joint MapGuide/FDO
PSC, but that I would see it as a transitional thing, and that
at some point they would likely be distinct projects.  But this
is a blurry line.

Best regards,

> On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:54 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> 
>> Robert Bray wrote:
>>
>>> On a side topic the Feature Data Objects API is just about ready to 
>>> go fully open. Since MapGuide is FDOs only open source user at the 
>>> moment I am thinking of managing the two projects under a single 
>>> umbrella (e.g. one PSC for both). Does anyone have any issues with 
>>> that or reasons for not doing it that way?
>>
>> Do the 2 projects share the same Project Management Committee?  The 
>> same developers?  The same goals?
 >>
>> If they don't, then I think you should be considering two umbrellas.
>>
>> --Cameron Shorter
>> http://cameron.shorter.net
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: incubator-unsubscribe at incubator.osgeo.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: incubator-help at incubator.osgeo.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: incubator-unsubscribe at incubator.osgeo.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: incubator-help at incubator.osgeo.org
> 
> 
> 


-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF,
http://osgeo.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: incubator-unsubscribe at incubator.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: incubator-help at incubator.osgeo.org