[Incubator] Motion: GDAL to Graduate Incubation

[Cameron Shorter]

Thanks Frank. I'm now +1 for graduation.

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> To clarify my reasoning, I see the Providence Review as a One Time 
>> document that is produced as part of graduation. It is created, 
>> reviewed, then archived.
>> So when we sign off on the document, I don't expect to see any 
>> changes. Ie, I don't expect the "TO_RESOLVE" items to be closed. This 
>> doesn't look good from a reviewers point of view looking to verify 
>> credibility of the project.
>>
>> So for each of your TO_RESOLVE issues I suggest you do one of the 
>> following:
>> 1. Create an issue in an issue tracker and track that way. (You might 
>> set the priority very low so that it doesn't show on anyone's radar).
>> 2. Note that the issue is trivial and not worth tracking. Therefore 
>> the issue can be closed out.
>
> Cameron,
>
> I concur.  I have reviewed the outstanding items, and adjusted the 
> provenance
> review with an explanation of why I think several of the items are 
> fine.  And
> I have filed tickets on the three coordinate system dictionary files 
> that I
> think need further review.
>
>   http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/GDAL_Provenance_Review
>
>   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2165
>   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2162
>   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2163
>
> Best regards,


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Systems Architect
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Commercial Support for Geospatial Open Source Solutions
http://www.lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts.html