[Incubator] Motion: GDAL to Graduate Incubation

[Frank Warmerdam]

Cameron Shorter wrote:
> To clarify my reasoning, I see the Providence Review as a One Time 
> document that is produced as part of graduation. It is created, 
> reviewed, then archived.
> So when we sign off on the document, I don't expect to see any changes. 
> Ie, I don't expect the "TO_RESOLVE" items to be closed. This doesn't 
> look good from a reviewers point of view looking to verify credibility 
> of the project.
> 
> So for each of your TO_RESOLVE issues I suggest you do one of the 
> following:
> 1. Create an issue in an issue tracker and track that way. (You might 
> set the priority very low so that it doesn't show on anyone's radar).
> 2. Note that the issue is trivial and not worth tracking. Therefore the 
> issue can be closed out.

Cameron,

I concur.  I have reviewed the outstanding items, and adjusted the provenance
review with an explanation of why I think several of the items are fine.  And
I have filed tickets on the three coordinate system dictionary files that I
think need further review.

   http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/GDAL_Provenance_Review

   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2165
   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2162
   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2163

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org