[Incubator] deegree incubation progress - who has the ball?

[Frank Warmerdam]

Jody Garnett wrote:
> Oh dear; I thought I had done that back in October.
> 
> I reiterate my recommendation; deegree has done everything we have asked as
> part of the incubation process. In particular their presentation IP issues
> is very clear and easy to follow. I also liked the transparency of their
> development process (in meeting notes were clear with action points and so
> forth).
> 
> The only issues raised have been concern about the breadth of organisations
> associated with the project.  This was expressed as both a business process
> concern (not sure if it something we actually try to review in the
> incubation process); and in terms of the comfort level of the incubation
> committee.
> 
> In the last incubation meeting it was decided to give the committee time to
> both review the documentation and ask any additional questions of the
> deegree team.
> 
> I have not seen any progress on either of these fronts; my recommendation
> still stands.

Jody,

Please write this in a new thread as a motion to the committee.  You can use
this example as a template:

   http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2009-May/001133.html

Ultimately a motion is how action/decision is galvanized.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent