[Incubator] PyWPS

[Peter Baumann]

hm, how would you pursue this in practice? Should a company open its 
books, and for whom and to check what exactly?
My naive, admittedly pretty uneducated idea was that in this cosmos of 
coexistence open source and business both are free, based only on the 
licensing text and the contributor agreements. But maybe I misunderstood 
something in this thread and misinterpret now.

-Peter


Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>   
>> I might be wrong on the details, but the spirit was "it's ok
>> as long as money it goes back into growing the project".
>>
>> The idea is, it would be a channel to allow entities that are
>> scared off by the GPL to support the project evolution nonetheless.
>>     
>
> Andrea,
>
> I agree.  Alternate licensing pursued by the PSC with resulting
> funds held on behalf of the project would seem reasonable to me.
>
> Best regards,
>   

-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
 - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
   www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
   mail: p.baumann at jacobs-university.de
   tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 147737)
   www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann at rasdaman.com
   tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 10xx)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20100312/c98ecf12/attachment-0001.html