[Incubator] Motion for pycsw to enter Incubation process [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Jody Garnett]

Fair enough, can I just double check if we are taking a requirement: to enter incubation, or if this is respect to graduating (i.e. being recognised an OSGeo project).

We have been fine with taking on projects that do not have a balanced community before, or have not yet decided how to handle open governance - and have some great example of these being addressed during incubation.

--  
Jody Garnett


On Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:

> Re: [Incubator] Motion for pycsw to enter Incubation process [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jody,
>  
> I’d like us to be a bit more prescriptive of what we want from a community, particularly regarding an open development and governance process.
>  
> Please see my summary of the thread at [1] for context.
>  
> Bruce
>  
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2013-March/002090.html
>  
>  
> On 21/03/13 10:01 AM, "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
> > We do have some light community requirements for graduation (developers/community communicating well), as long as the project understands those requirements for graduation (and the mentor is happy to assist) I am cool with it.  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20130321/59fb9b9b/attachment.html>