[Incubator] Suggested tweaks to incubator docs
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Wed Feb 19 11:56:28 PST 2014
On 20/02/14 06:10, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> On 14-02-19 7:04 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>> Evaluation Criteria:
>>
>> Do not understand why "Project is prepared to develop in an open and
>> collaborative fashion." was cut, is this not the sticking point we have
>> run into a couple times now?
>>
>> I feel that we could combine the questionnaire and the evaluation
>> criteria. By using italics in the template.
>>
>
> Same question here. I also don't understand why this one was taken out.
>
> Actually, I think there are two items that were cut and are important
> enough to justify being there:
>
>
> # Project is prepared to develop in an open and collaborative fashion.
>
> # Project has contributions and interest from more than just one
> company/organization.
>
>
>
Yes, valid points by both Jody and Daniel.
Jody, I agree that merging these two documents as you suggest will
simplify the process and future maintenance. It is a very good idea.
--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com, F +61 2 9009 5099
More information about the Incubator
mailing list