[Incubator] Suggested tweaks to incubator docs

[Landon Blake]

Do we need some type of motion to make the edits, or does someone just need
to do it?

Landon


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On 20/02/14 06:10, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>
>> On 14-02-19 7:04 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Evaluation Criteria:
>>>
>>> Do not understand why "Project is prepared to develop in an open and
>>> collaborative fashion." was cut, is this not the sticking point we have
>>> run into a couple times now?
>>>
>>> I feel that we could combine the questionnaire and the evaluation
>>> criteria. By using italics in the template.
>>>
>>>
>> Same question here. I also don't understand why this one was taken out.
>>
>> Actually, I think there are two items that were cut and are important
>> enough to justify being there:
>>
>>
>>  # Project is prepared to develop in an open and collaborative fashion.
>>
>>  # Project has contributions and interest from more than just one
>> company/organization.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Yes, valid points by both Jody and Daniel.
> Jody, I agree that merging these two documents as you suggest will
> simplify the process and future maintenance. It is a very good idea.
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20140228/18936bb2/attachment.html>