[Incubator] [Board] osgeo labs

[Landon Blake]

Jachym wrote: "I personally think, "incubation labs" are one of the key
parts of
OSGeo, which could attract more project to OSGeo."

Agreed.

Jachym wrote: "I do have feeling (please, do not take it personally, and
correct me if I'm wrong), that our "incubation labs" are sleeping a bit - I
would like to wake them up."

Agreed. Could use a little waking up. :]

Even wrote: "Instead of words, why not having figures to measure the level
of progress."

I like it...but I'd want to get comments from other members of the
incubation committee.

Jachym wrote: "I volunteer to warm up things. I hope, someone else will
pick the
topic (at least later) and continue during years :)"

I'd still like to help. In my mind we need to do the following for a reboot
of incucbation labs:

1) Choose a new name/identification scheme.
2) Scrub the wiki pages.
3) Contact previous projects listed in labs to see if they are still
interested in participating.
4) Create a list of goals for the typical project that joins process.
5) Work to help projects on list reach goals.

Landon

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18 September 2014 23:10, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Or
> >
> > level 1 - project (name, license, headers)
> > level 2 - code clean checked
> > level 3 - steering committee
> > level 4 - ...
> > level 5 - community, mature osgeo project
> >
> > drift between levels is possible both ways (you lost community e.g.)
> >
>
> I really like this idea...
>
> > jody could give more insight view
> >
> > Jachym
> >
>
> --
> ciao
> Luca
>
> http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
> www.lucadelu.org
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20140922/6d6edc65/attachment.html>