[Incubator] [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
tomkralidis at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 04:13:44 PST 2015
Jachym: +1. Another thing to consider is maintenance. How often should OSGeo projects
be assessed for freshness and change in rating? Yearly? 2x/year?
Having said this adding projects should be more agile.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:27:14 +0000
> From: Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> To: Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>,
> "incubator at lists.osgeo.org" <incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
> just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to
> change their name.
> My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and "projects"
> and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating
> Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or
> po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
>>> former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
>>> you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>> Hi Jachym,
>> do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs"
>> by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and
>> Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs,
>> although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is
>> ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for
>> All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the
>> linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element).
>> Thanks for taking this into consideration,
More information about the Incubator