[Incubator] osgeo innovator (was labs)
jeroen.ticheler at geocat.net
Wed Feb 3 23:47:46 PST 2016
I understand the naming confusion. The Innovator name however has IMO a negative reflection on the established projects. Are new projects necessarily more innovative than established ones? Often they are still so small they don't have established communities/structures etc in place. That's indeed why the Labs were created.
I will think about another potential name and I hope others feel the same and will also think of an alternative naming for the Labs. I remember you saying something like Hatching (synonym of incubating, so maybe to co fusing).
Maybe OSGeo Experiments.
GeoCat Bridge for ArcGIS allows instant publishing of data and metadata on GeoServer, MapServer, PostGIS and GeoNetwork. Visit http://geocat.net for details.
6721 WD Bennekom
Tel: +31 (0)6 81286572
> Op 4 feb. 2016 om 03:25 heeft Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> A couple of results for the incubation team out of the weekend's board meeting.
> We have the "GeoForAll Labs" and our OSGeo labs projects - and the two names trip on each other.
> Board members were also a bit taken aback that our incubation process is not really "welcome" to innovation (indeed our graduation requirements tend to favour established projects).
> With that in mind - I would like to kick off:
> 1) Renaming OSGeo Labs as OSGeo Innovator
> The branding for this is way better for projects! Having an "OSGeo Innovator" badge on your home page is way more "positive" an impression.
> 2) Revise the procedures around this activity
> My first take is:
> - provide a home for small project teams / single organization projects
> - focus on new projects (so provide README, CONTRIBUTING, PSC files for a project to copy into github)
> - stick to our "open source" and "open development" guns!
> - "save the sticker" until on-boarding is complete
> Jody Garnett
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the Incubator