[Incubator] osgeo innovator, experiment, community, builder, shed, barn, garage, ...

[Jachym Cepicky]

Hi,

option "Incubation level 1" not available :)

that would require redesign of the incubation process, but alas, that is
another work I started but never finished :-(

J

st 10. 2. 2016 v 2:11 odesílatel Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com>
napsal:

> I"ve set-up a quick little online survey to help us reboot (and rename)
> the OSGeo Incubation Labs.
>
> Here is the survey:
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1hFLM5F0VSR44D0i-vMTBw2rCc7J99-CcqJuJRwESf2E/viewform
>
> It might help to read this page first:
>
>
> It explains what I originally hope to accomplish for projects with the
> OSGeo Incubation Labs.
>
> I'll tally and publish the survey results to the list on Friday after
> lunch (Pacific Time Zone).
>
> After we've chosen a name, I'll clean-up and rename the wiki page.
>
> Thanks for participating in the survey!
>
> Landon
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We do not have the option of leaving it as OSGeo labs (that has been
>> adopted by GeoForAll).
>>
>> I understand your feedback about incubation and the lack of benefits of
>> incubation. Something we are seeking to address - this conversation being a
>> first step.
>>
>> If it helps the board discussed hiring someone to perform the initial
>> code review. I feel that the initial code review is valuable, but
>> subsequent code reviews (once a project is part of the foundation) could be
>> outsourced.
>>
>> There are more ideas but I will leave it as that for now.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:06 AM Stephen Woodbridge <
>> woodbri at swoodbridge.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Replying for pgRouting:
>>>
>>> Regarding the naming -
>>> 1) leave it as OSGeo Labs
>>> 2) Supporting OSGeo
>>> 3) the suggested names look like slang of English speaking person
>>>
>>> We like the idea of "Supporting OSGeo" where a project can claim this,
>>> maybe with some minimal requirements, like code is on github and is
>>> valid open source license. In general our feeling about incubation is
>>> that the effort required to accomplish this does not match the benefits
>>> attained by do it. We see it as hard to find a motivated mentor, lost of
>>> paper work and projects get lost in incubation process for years due to
>>> slow process on both sides.
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>> On 2/5/2016 11:34 PM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
>>> > On 2/5/2016 9:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> >> Names suggested for OSGeo labs:
>>> >> - Alley
>>> >> - Basement, Cellar, Dungeon
>>> >> - Builder
>>> >> - Community
>>> >> - Community Builder Project
>>> >> - Experiment
>>> >> - Garage
>>> >> - Innovator
>>> >> - Landing, Dock
>>> >> - Path, Paths, Pathways
>>> >> - Patio, Dec
>>> >> - Project Barn
>>> >> - Project Shed
>>> >> - Shed
>>> >> - Side Street
>>> >> - Technology
>>> >> - Trail
>>> >> - Yard
>>> >>
>>> >> Landon if you could contact "Lab" projects and ask them to reply to
>>> this
>>> >> thread, with the name of their project - and their top three
>>> preferences
>>> >> from the above list:
>>> >>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: Geoinformatica
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_Geoinformatica>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: pgRouting
>>> >
>>> > I'll discuss this with the pgRouting team and get back to you with our
>>> > preferences.
>>> >
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_pgRouting>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: PAGC <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_PAGC>
>>> >
>>> > PAGC can probably be dropped from the labs list at this point. The core
>>> > reusable piece of this project (the address standardizer) has been
>>> moved
>>> > into the PostGIS Geocoder. I will in the process of creating a new
>>> > address standardizer written in C++ that will replace that code with
>>> the
>>> > goal of being more maintainable, support UTF8 for international support
>>> > and I will be working with the PostGIS team to rewrite the geocoder to
>>> > be data set agnostic.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >    -Steve
>>> >
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: MapProxy
>>> >> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_MapProxy>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: pycsw <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_pycsw>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: The SurveyOS KML Toolkit
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_The_SurveyOS_KML_Toolkit
>>> >
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: SlitherGrid
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_SlitherGrid>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: Virtual Terrain Project
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_Virtual_Terrain_Project>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: PyWPS <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_PyWPS>
>>> >>   * OSGeo Labs: OSGeo Certification
>>> >>     <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs:_OSGeo_Certification>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jody Garnett
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Incubator mailing list
>>> >> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Incubator mailing list
>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20160210/04f2e18b/attachment-0001.html>