[Incubator] Info on the Old OSGeo Labs
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Thu Mar 3 07:13:45 PST 2016
+1, I think these changes make a lot of sense and as part of an OSGeo
Technology project this feels very inclusive.
-Steve W
On 3/3/2016 9:46 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I would like to change the tone of the page a bit, since it "assumes"
> incubation ..
>
> /OSGeo Labs is an umbrella for open source geospatial software
> projects that would like to become OSGeo projects in the future, but
> that aren't ready for incubation quite yet. It is appropriate to
> submit your new or experimental project as an OSGeo labs project./
> /
> /
> /The volunteers that work as part of OSGeo Labs have the goal of
> helping OSGeo Labs Projects qualify for incubation. To reach this
> goal, OSGeo Labs volunteers help OSGeo Labs Projects with the
> following tasks:
> /
>
>
> Would become:
>
> /Welcome to OSGeo Technology. The projects listed here are part of
> the Open Source Geospatial Foundation and range from new
> experimental projects to established pillars of our open source
> ecosystem./
> /
> /
> /All projects here meet our goals as an organization - they are open
> source (no really we checked) and are inclusive and welcoming to new
> contributors./
> /
> /
>
> /Projects that go on to establish excellence in community building,
> documentation, and governance can enter our "incubation" program. /
>
>
> I would also lose the "status" conditions seed/seedling/sapling/adult
> and keep OSGeo Technology focused on the basics (open source &
> inclusive). The status becomes having the "OSGeo Technology" badge nice
> and simple.
>
> Thinking this through a bit more we have one clear reason for projects
> to go through with incubation - being recognized by the board and having
> an OSGeo Officer listed directly for the project, while OSGeo Technology
> projects "share" an officer (as part of "incubation committee").
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 11 February 2016 at 11:04, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com
> <mailto:sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> There is some good information on what we were trying to achieve
> with the old OSGeo Labs on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs
>
> I think most of that information on the wiki still applies. This
> includes the purpose of labs, how projects get started in labs, what
> labs is trying to accomplish, and the criteria to determine if your
> project is a good fit for labs.
>
> Does anyone have major heartburn with what is laid out on that wiki
> page? (I'll rename the wiki page as soon as we get a new name for labs.)
>
> Landon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Incubator
mailing list