[Incubator] Considering Portable GIS as an OSGeo community project

Jody Garnett jody.garnett at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 07:34:15 PDT 2017


Jo with your permission I would like to put a motion before the incubation
committee, you have been more than kind adding the files we requested, and
we managed to find some things to work on in your codebase which is a great
result.

--
Jody Garnett

On 7 September 2017 at 07:02, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> We actually found that adding the license headers is not strictly required
> these days - but wise so people do not accidentally copy things without
> knowing what license is around. But there is no legal need to have the
> header with a constantly updated copyright etc...
>
> For more information see here:
> - GeoTools: GeoTools Header Policy Updated
> <https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj_wv6BnpPWAhUS82MKHZrPC5EQFggoMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgeotoolsnews.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F06%2Fgeotools-header-policy-updated.html&usg=AFQjCNHWd3sOZ_u5dEyw7-5B_VOrLzg8DA>
>
> We actually had to go to osgeo legal council and figure that stuff out,
> apparently all our header maintenance traditions predate a treaty and are
> left over from the 80s.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 7 September 2017 at 03:04, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jody,
>>
>> Thanks for these suggestions. I'm in the middle of implementing the
>> changes you've suggested- I've updated the license and included a section
>> in the contributors document about GPLv3. I think the other thing I need to
>> do is add the license header to all my batch files, which I will start
>> working on asap.
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good Jo, I will be happy to make the motion in a bit.
>>>
>>> I like the friendly tone for CONTRIBUTING.md file, can I recommend
>>> making a note somewhere in there that people should contribute their
>>> changes to the project using a GPL3 license.
>>>
>>> Sometimes groups like Apache like to have a seperate license for
>>> contributions that is different from the license used for distribution.
>>> GPL3 tends to serve both these needs - but your contributors should be
>>> really clear they are providing the project the code / fix / change with a
>>> GPL license so there are no tears later. One trick I use to double check
>>> consent is to ask these pull requests to include adding their name to the a
>>> CONTRIBUTORS list in the documentation - both so I can credit them in
>>> release notes and have a list of participants.
>>>
>>> It also looks like your LICENSE file is just the header, rather than a
>>> full GPL license.  For complete text see:
>>> - https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
>>> - https://github.com/IQAndreas/markdown-licenses
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 28 August 2017 at 10:02, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've added a contributing guidelines page and moved the license and
>>>> changelog to the root of the portable gis repository at
>>>> https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek/portable-gis. Does it all look OK?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who has offered to assist with Portable GIS- it's
>>>> really appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>>
>>>> Jo
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Landon Blake <
>>>> sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If I can help Jo with set-up as a community project, let me know. I'm
>>>>> a Windows user...so I can help with the testing of releases. I'd also be
>>>>> interested in learning more about how this works. :]
>>>>>
>>>>> Landon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no relationship as such between Portable GIS and OSGeo4W-
>>>>>> they are really complimentary projects with different objectives. The way I
>>>>>> see it, Portable GIS provides a portable (hence the name) set of open
>>>>>> source geospatial tools that don't require installation and can be taken
>>>>>> from windows computer to windows computer on a USB stick,compared to
>>>>>> OSGeo4W, which provides a streamlined way of installing the tools on a
>>>>>> machine. They have some packages in common, but not all (I include
>>>>>> PostgreSQL/PostGIS and GeoServer alongside QGIS, Mapserver etc, but
>>>>>> otherwise a much more limited set of tools than OSGeo4W due to space
>>>>>> considerations).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When OSGeo4W first came out (believe it or not, Portable GIS predates
>>>>>> it) there was some discussion about the possible relationship between the
>>>>>> two packages at that point, but like I say, they have different objectives
>>>>>> and exist in harmony together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that clears things up- I'll add some disambiguation to the
>>>>>> readme and website next time I do an update!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just curious about the relationship to osgeo4w
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Hi Jo,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I'm really excited to see you pushing Portable GIS forward. I
>>>>>>> think that
>>>>>>> > having a windows based OSGeo distribution is a great complement to
>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live, as OSGeo-Live is tied into (and limited to) being a
>>>>>>> linux
>>>>>>> > distribution.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I also see potential for collaboration between OSGeo-Live and
>>>>>>> Portable GIS.
>>>>>>> > Eg, the OSGeo-Live Project Overviews could note whether the
>>>>>>> project is
>>>>>>> > available on Portable GIS.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > We could also potentially align OSGeo-Live and Portable GIS release
>>>>>>> > schedules (which would help with aligning documentation).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Re packaging, have you considered building with cygwin (which is
>>>>>>> Open
>>>>>>> > Source)?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I'm happy to answer questions about license. While I'm not a
>>>>>>> lawyer, I have
>>>>>>> > been involved in plenty of licensing selection discussions,
>>>>>>> including for
>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Re Portable GIS licensing, I assume your build tools are not
>>>>>>> embedded in the
>>>>>>> > final Portable GIS software distribution? That would mean that the
>>>>>>> final
>>>>>>> > software distribution does not inherit to the license of the build
>>>>>>> tools. So
>>>>>>> > I suspect you should be ok to select what ever license you choose
>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>> > build tools. That is how we have approached the OSGeo-Live build
>>>>>>> scripts,
>>>>>>> > which are LGPL. (Documentation is licensed under CC-By for Project
>>>>>>> Overviews
>>>>>>> > and CC-By-SA for Quickstarts).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On 24/8/17 1:22 am, Jo Cook wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi Jody and list,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Having had a bit of a think about licensing, I had previously
>>>>>>> chosen GPLv3
>>>>>>> > *for my components alone* and I think I'm happy with that. As far
>>>>>>> as I can
>>>>>>> > tell, I can license my modifications alone with GPLv3 regardless
>>>>>>> of what the
>>>>>>> > software projects themselves are. I've had a look at how OSGeo
>>>>>>> Live works,
>>>>>>> > but that doesn't help much (https://live.osgeo.org/en/cop
>>>>>>> yright.html). Is
>>>>>>> > there anyone on the list who could help me out with this-
>>>>>>> basically to
>>>>>>> > confirm or deny?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Jo
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Jo Cook <
>>>>>>> jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> That all sounds really encouraging and yes I'd be happy to go
>>>>>>> through the
>>>>>>> >> process with you and the team. We (Astun) potentially have
>>>>>>> another project
>>>>>>> >> that we'd like to submit for consideration too, and I'll be in
>>>>>>> touch
>>>>>>> >> separately about that one.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Regarding autoit, no you don't need to purchase anything to use
>>>>>>> it. Having
>>>>>>> >> thought about this in some more detail, I think I will try to
>>>>>>> move away from
>>>>>>> >> that dependency and try to find an open source alternative but
>>>>>>> that will
>>>>>>> >> obviously take some time to work through, so it would be good if
>>>>>>> we could
>>>>>>> >> start working through the process of becoming a community project
>>>>>>> while that
>>>>>>> >> is ongoing.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I'll make some tweaks to the repository to make sure that the
>>>>>>> various docs
>>>>>>> >> are easy to find, and then maybe come back to you when that's
>>>>>>> ready. I want
>>>>>>> >> to think a little about whether I'm using the most appropriate
>>>>>>> license too.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Jo
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Glad to hear from you Jo!
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Although the "OSGeo community" initiative was started last year,
>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>> >>> not had a chance to try it out yet (perhaps due to lack of
>>>>>>> publicity). If
>>>>>>> >>> you are patient with us we would enjoy going through this
>>>>>>> process with you,
>>>>>>> >>> and revising our notes as we go.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> The wiki OSGeo Community Projects page has the following recipe:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> If your project would like to join OSGeo the technology
>>>>>>> initiative asks:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> That your project is geospatial (or directly supports geospatial
>>>>>>> >>> applications);
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Data & doc projects would of course need an appropriate data or
>>>>>>> >>> documentation license
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> That your project is open source
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Uses an OSI approved open source license
>>>>>>> >>> That you know where your source code came from, and that care is
>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>> >>> when accepting external contributions
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Participatory (accepts pull-requests)
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Along with a few notes on how we can quickly check the LICENSE,
>>>>>>> >>> CONTRIBUTING, README files.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> autoit
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Your question about autoit is tricky, it is freely distributable
>>>>>>> - so not
>>>>>>> >>> a barrier to use. We are actually in a similar spot for the
>>>>>>> GeoTools and
>>>>>>> >>> GeoServer projects. When they were first created Java was not
>>>>>>> open source so
>>>>>>> >>> there were some very heated discussions with the gvSig team on
>>>>>>> if you could
>>>>>>> >>> ever make a free software solution using Java.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> But we are an open source software foundation (not at a free
>>>>>>> software
>>>>>>> >>> foundation) allowing GeoTools, GeoServer .. and by extension
>>>>>>> autoit.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> This question of Java still troubles us, while Java is now open
>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>> >>> the image processing library that was included in Java is still
>>>>>>> only free to
>>>>>>> >>> distribute. This causes problems for the OSGeo Live and uDig
>>>>>>> projects.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> I would be concerned though if people need to purchase autoit in
>>>>>>> order to
>>>>>>> >>> work on your project? There is a slight difference between being
>>>>>>> required to
>>>>>>> >>> purchase a tool, and optionally using a tool. For GeoTools we
>>>>>>> can "work
>>>>>>> >>> with" the Oracle Database (if user installs the right jars they
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> >>> downloaded from Oracle) or ArcSDE (if the user installs the
>>>>>>> right jars they
>>>>>>> >>> have purchased from ESRI). However if a contributor is not in
>>>>>>> possession of
>>>>>>> >>> these artifacts they can still work on the project as a whole.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>> >>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> On 22 August 2017 at 06:25, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Hi Incubator List,
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> As you may or may not know, I have been running a small project
>>>>>>> called
>>>>>>> >>>> Portable GIS (GIS on a USB stick for Windows) for a number of
>>>>>>> years. The
>>>>>>> >>>> basic premise is to provide a no-install, no-config version of
>>>>>>> many of the
>>>>>>> >>>> common open source GIS projects on a USB stick.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Recently I built a website for the project (portablegis.xyz)
>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>> >>>> working through the process of documenting and publishing all
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> >>>> configuration changes that need to be made to make projects
>>>>>>> portable (mainly
>>>>>>> >>>> batch files to be honest). This also includes the source code
>>>>>>> for building
>>>>>>> >>>> the menu and installer files.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> This is on Gitlab at https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek
>>>>>>> /portable-gis so that
>>>>>>> >>>> I can now start accepting contributions. Note that this
>>>>>>> repository does not
>>>>>>> >>>> contain the actual source code for the projects such as QGIS,
>>>>>>> it just
>>>>>>> >>>> contains the files that need to be adjusted to make it work
>>>>>>> portably.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> One of my colleagues has suggested that Portable GIS could be
>>>>>>> an OSGeo
>>>>>>> >>>> Community Project, so here I am, asking about it :-)
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> My main concern is that autoit, which I used for building the
>>>>>>> menu, is
>>>>>>> >>>> freeware rather than opensource (see
>>>>>>> https://www.autoitscript.com/site/ and
>>>>>>> >>>> specifically https://www.autoitscript.com/a
>>>>>>> utoit3/docs/license.htm). My gut
>>>>>>> >>>> feeling is that this bars Portable GIS from being truly open
>>>>>>> source, and
>>>>>>> >>>> hence not suitable for being an OSGeo Community Project. Would
>>>>>>> that be
>>>>>>> >>>> correct?
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> If this was the only bar to entry, I could certainly look at
>>>>>>> alternative
>>>>>>> >>>> options for building the menu.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Regards
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Jo
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>> >>>> Jo Cook
>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>> >>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>> Surrey,
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> >>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>> >>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>> >>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and
>>>>>>> Wales.
>>>>>>> >>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19
>>>>>>> 8LN
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>> >>>> 864201149.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>> >> Jo Cook
>>>>>>> >> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Jo Cook
>>>>>>> > t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> > 7RL, UK
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> > t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>> > GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>> > Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>>> > Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>> > 864201149.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>> > M +61 419 142 254
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>> Surrey, KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Landon
>>>>> "Homemade cookies. Hmmmmmmmmmm!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Web: www.landonblake.com
>>>>>
>>>>> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/landonblake
>>>>>
>>>>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LandonBlake
>>>>>
>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scott.l.blake.3
>>>>>
>>>>> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/landon_blake/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>
>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com twitter
>>>> :@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>
>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>
>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Jo Cook*
>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>
>>
>> --
>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>> KT18 7RL, UK
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com twitter:
>> @astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>
>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>
>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20171017/df46d44f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Incubator mailing list