[Incubator] Considering Portable GIS as an OSGeo community project

Tue Oct 17 07:40:15 PDT 2017

Hi Jody,

Sure- I thought I probably had some more work to do adding the license
header to all the files, which I haven't quite found time to do yet!

Jo

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Jo with your permission I would like to put a motion before the incubation
> committee, you have been more than kind adding the files we requested, and
> we managed to find some things to work on in your codebase which is a great
> result.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 7 September 2017 at 07:02, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We actually found that adding the license headers is not strictly
>> required these days - but wise so people do not accidentally copy things
>> without knowing what license is around. But there is no legal need to have
>> the header with a constantly updated copyright etc...
>>
>> For more information see here:
>> - GeoTools: GeoTools Header Policy Updated
>> <https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj_wv6BnpPWAhUS82MKHZrPC5EQFggoMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgeotoolsnews.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F06%2Fgeotools-header-policy-updated.html&usg=AFQjCNHWd3sOZ_u5dEyw7-5B_VOrLzg8DA>
>>
>> We actually had to go to osgeo legal council and figure that stuff out,
>> apparently all our header maintenance traditions predate a treaty and are
>> left over from the 80s.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 7 September 2017 at 03:04, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jody,
>>>
>>> Thanks for these suggestions. I'm in the middle of implementing the
>>> changes you've suggested- I've updated the license and included a section
>>> in the contributors document about GPLv3. I think the other thing I need to
>>> do is add the license header to all my batch files, which I will start
>>> working on asap.
>>>
>>> Jo
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks good Jo, I will be happy to make the motion in a bit.
>>>>
>>>> I like the friendly tone for CONTRIBUTING.md file, can I recommend
>>>> making a note somewhere in there that people should contribute their
>>>> changes to the project using a GPL3 license.
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes groups like Apache like to have a seperate license for
>>>> contributions that is different from the license used for distribution.
>>>> GPL3 tends to serve both these needs - but your contributors should be
>>>> really clear they are providing the project the code / fix / change with a
>>>> GPL license so there are no tears later. One trick I use to double check
>>>> consent is to ask these pull requests to include adding their name to the a
>>>> CONTRIBUTORS list in the documentation - both so I can credit them in
>>>> release notes and have a list of participants.
>>>>
>>>> It also looks like your LICENSE file is just the header, rather than a
>>>> full GPL license.  For complete text see:
>>>> - https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
>>>> - https://github.com/IQAndreas/markdown-licenses
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>
>>>> On 28 August 2017 at 10:02, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've added a contributing guidelines page and moved the license and
>>>>> changelog to the root of the portable gis repository at
>>>>> https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek/portable-gis. Does it all look OK?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has offered to assist with Portable GIS- it's
>>>>> really appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best
>>>>>
>>>>> Jo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Landon Blake <
>>>>> sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If I can help Jo with set-up as a community project, let me know. I'm
>>>>>> a Windows user...so I can help with the testing of releases. I'd also be
>>>>>> interested in learning more about how this works. :]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Landon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's no relationship as such between Portable GIS and OSGeo4W-
>>>>>>> they are really complimentary projects with different objectives. The way I
>>>>>>> see it, Portable GIS provides a portable (hence the name) set of open
>>>>>>> source geospatial tools that don't require installation and can be taken
>>>>>>> from windows computer to windows computer on a USB stick,compared to
>>>>>>> OSGeo4W, which provides a streamlined way of installing the tools on a
>>>>>>> machine. They have some packages in common, but not all (I include
>>>>>>> PostgreSQL/PostGIS and GeoServer alongside QGIS, Mapserver etc, but
>>>>>>> otherwise a much more limited set of tools than OSGeo4W due to space
>>>>>>> considerations).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When OSGeo4W first came out (believe it or not, Portable GIS
>>>>>>> predates it) there was some discussion about the possible relationship
>>>>>>> between the two packages at that point, but like I say, they have different
>>>>>>> objectives and exist in harmony together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope that clears things up- I'll add some disambiguation to the
>>>>>>> readme and website next time I do an update!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just curious about the relationship to osgeo4w
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> > Hi Jo,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I'm really excited to see you pushing Portable GIS forward. I
>>>>>>>> think that
>>>>>>>> > having a windows based OSGeo distribution is a great complement to
>>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live, as OSGeo-Live is tied into (and limited to) being a
>>>>>>>> linux
>>>>>>>> > distribution.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I also see potential for collaboration between OSGeo-Live and
>>>>>>>> Portable GIS.
>>>>>>>> > Eg, the OSGeo-Live Project Overviews could note whether the
>>>>>>>> project is
>>>>>>>> > available on Portable GIS.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > We could also potentially align OSGeo-Live and Portable GIS
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> > schedules (which would help with aligning documentation).
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Re packaging, have you considered building with cygwin (which is
>>>>>>>> Open
>>>>>>>> > Source)?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I'm happy to answer questions about license. While I'm not a
>>>>>>>> lawyer, I have
>>>>>>>> > been involved in plenty of licensing selection discussions,
>>>>>>>> including for
>>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Re Portable GIS licensing, I assume your build tools are not
>>>>>>>> embedded in the
>>>>>>>> > final Portable GIS software distribution? That would mean that
>>>>>>>> the final
>>>>>>>> > software distribution does not inherit to the license of the
>>>>>>>> build tools. So
>>>>>>>> > I suspect you should be ok to select what ever license you choose
>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>> > build tools. That is how we have approached the OSGeo-Live build
>>>>>>>> scripts,
>>>>>>>> > which are LGPL. (Documentation is licensed under CC-By for
>>>>>>>> Project Overviews
>>>>>>>> > and CC-By-SA for Quickstarts).
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On 24/8/17 1:22 am, Jo Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hi Jody and list,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Having had a bit of a think about licensing, I had previously
>>>>>>>> chosen GPLv3
>>>>>>>> > *for my components alone* and I think I'm happy with that. As far
>>>>>>>> as I can
>>>>>>>> > tell, I can license my modifications alone with GPLv3 regardless
>>>>>>>> of what the
>>>>>>>> > software projects themselves are. I've had a look at how OSGeo
>>>>>>>> Live works,
>>>>>>>> > but that doesn't help much (https://live.osgeo.org/en/cop
>>>>>>>> yright.html). Is
>>>>>>>> > there anyone on the list who could help me out with this-
>>>>>>>> basically to
>>>>>>>> > confirm or deny?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Jo
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Jo Cook <
>>>>>>>> jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> That all sounds really encouraging and yes I'd be happy to go
>>>>>>>> through the
>>>>>>>> >> process with you and the team. We (Astun) potentially have
>>>>>>>> another project
>>>>>>>> >> that we'd like to submit for consideration too, and I'll be in
>>>>>>>> touch
>>>>>>>> >> separately about that one.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Regarding autoit, no you don't need to purchase anything to use
>>>>>>>> it. Having
>>>>>>>> >> thought about this in some more detail, I think I will try to
>>>>>>>> move away from
>>>>>>>> >> that dependency and try to find an open source alternative but
>>>>>>>> that will
>>>>>>>> >> obviously take some time to work through, so it would be good if
>>>>>>>> we could
>>>>>>>> >> start working through the process of becoming a community
>>>>>>>> project while that
>>>>>>>> >> is ongoing.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I'll make some tweaks to the repository to make sure that the
>>>>>>>> various docs
>>>>>>>> >> are easy to find, and then maybe come back to you when that's
>>>>>>>> ready. I want
>>>>>>>> >> to think a little about whether I'm using the most appropriate
>>>>>>>> license too.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Jo
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Glad to hear from you Jo!
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Although the "OSGeo community" initiative was started last
>>>>>>>> year, we have
>>>>>>>> >>> not had a chance to try it out yet (perhaps due to lack of
>>>>>>>> publicity). If
>>>>>>>> >>> you are patient with us we would enjoy going through this
>>>>>>>> process with you,
>>>>>>>> >>> and revising our notes as we go.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> The wiki OSGeo Community Projects page has the following recipe:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> If your project would like to join OSGeo the technology
>>>>>>>> initiative asks:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> That your project is geospatial (or directly supports geospatial
>>>>>>>> >>> applications);
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Data & doc projects would of course need an appropriate data or
>>>>>>>> >>> documentation license
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> That your project is open source
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Uses an OSI approved open source license
>>>>>>>> >>> That you know where your source code came from, and that care
>>>>>>>> is taken
>>>>>>>> >>> when accepting external contributions
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Participatory (accepts pull-requests)
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Along with a few notes on how we can quickly check the LICENSE,
>>>>>>>> >>> CONTRIBUTING, README files.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> autoit
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Your question about autoit is tricky, it is freely
>>>>>>>> distributable - so not
>>>>>>>> >>> a barrier to use. We are actually in a similar spot for the
>>>>>>>> GeoTools and
>>>>>>>> >>> GeoServer projects. When they were first created Java was not
>>>>>>>> open source so
>>>>>>>> >>> there were some very heated discussions with the gvSig team on
>>>>>>>> if you could
>>>>>>>> >>> ever make a free software solution using Java.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> But we are an open source software foundation (not at a free
>>>>>>>> software
>>>>>>>> >>> foundation) allowing GeoTools, GeoServer .. and by extension
>>>>>>>> autoit.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> This question of Java still troubles us, while Java is now open
>>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>>> >>> the image processing library that was included in Java is still
>>>>>>>> only free to
>>>>>>>> >>> distribute. This causes problems for the OSGeo Live and uDig
>>>>>>>> projects.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> I would be concerned though if people need to purchase autoit
>>>>>>>> in order to
>>>>>>>> >>> work on your project? There is a slight difference between
>>>>>>>> being required to
>>>>>>>> >>> purchase a tool, and optionally using a tool. For GeoTools we
>>>>>>>> can "work
>>>>>>>> >>> with" the Oracle Database (if user installs the right jars they
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> >>> downloaded from Oracle) or ArcSDE (if the user installs the
>>>>>>>> right jars they
>>>>>>>> >>> have purchased from ESRI). However if a contributor is not in
>>>>>>>> possession of
>>>>>>>> >>> these artifacts they can still work on the project as a whole.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>>> >>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> On 22 August 2017 at 06:25, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Hi Incubator List,
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> As you may or may not know, I have been running a small
>>>>>>>> project called
>>>>>>>> >>>> Portable GIS (GIS on a USB stick for Windows) for a number of
>>>>>>>> years. The
>>>>>>>> >>>> basic premise is to provide a no-install, no-config version of
>>>>>>>> many of the
>>>>>>>> >>>> common open source GIS projects on a USB stick.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Recently I built a website for the project (portablegis.xyz)
>>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>>> >>>> working through the process of documenting and publishing all
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> >>>> configuration changes that need to be made to make projects
>>>>>>>> portable (mainly
>>>>>>>> >>>> batch files to be honest). This also includes the source code
>>>>>>>> for building
>>>>>>>> >>>> the menu and installer files.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> This is on Gitlab at https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek
>>>>>>>> /portable-gis so that
>>>>>>>> >>>> I can now start accepting contributions. Note that this
>>>>>>>> repository does not
>>>>>>>> >>>> contain the actual source code for the projects such as QGIS,
>>>>>>>> it just
>>>>>>>> >>>> contains the files that need to be adjusted to make it work
>>>>>>>> portably.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> One of my colleagues has suggested that Portable GIS could be
>>>>>>>> an OSGeo
>>>>>>>> >>>> Community Project, so here I am, asking about it :-)
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> My main concern is that autoit, which I used for building the
>>>>>>>> menu, is
>>>>>>>> >>>> freeware rather than opensource (see
>>>>>>>> https://www.autoitscript.com/site/ and
>>>>>>>> >>>> specifically https://www.autoitscript.com/a
>>>>>>>> utoit3/docs/license.htm). My gut
>>>>>>>> >>>> feeling is that this bars Portable GIS from being truly open
>>>>>>>> source, and
>>>>>>>> >>>> hence not suitable for being an OSGeo Community Project. Would
>>>>>>>> that be
>>>>>>>> >>>> correct?
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> If this was the only bar to entry, I could certainly look at
>>>>>>>> alternative
>>>>>>>> >>>> options for building the menu.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Jo
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>>> >>>> Jo Cook
>>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>>> >>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>>> Surrey,
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> >>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>>> >>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>>> >>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and
>>>>>>>> Wales.
>>>>>>>> >>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19
>>>>>>>> 8LN
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>>> >>>> 864201149.
>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>>> >> Jo Cook
>>>>>>>> >> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Jo Cook
>>>>>>>> > t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> > 7RL, UK
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> > t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>>> > GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>>> > Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>>>> > Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>>> > 864201149.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>>> > M +61 419 142 254
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Landon
>>>>>> "Homemade cookies. Hmmmmmmmmmm!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Web: www.landonblake.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/landonblake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LandonBlake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scott.l.blake.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/landon_blake/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>>>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>
>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>
>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Jo Cook*
>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>
>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com twitter:
>>> @astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>
>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>
>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
*Jo Cook*
t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek

-- 
--
Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 
7RL, UK 
t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech 
<https://twitter.com/astuntech>

iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform 
<https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training 
<https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
Helpdesk and customer portal 
<http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>

Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales. 
Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN VAT no. 
864201149.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20171017/0067f1c2/attachment-0001.html>