[Incubator] geohealthcheck community sprint update

[Tom Kralidis]

Hi Jody: thanks for the review/comments.  Responses interleaved:

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 7:04 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Checklist,
>
> Checklist is expanding a bit based on recent experience (I would like to update our messaging as expectations change as illustrated by foss4g presentation and recent pygeoapi thread).
>
> 0) listed on the website http://www.osgeo.org/projects/geohealthcheck/
>
> - looks wonderful!
> - idea: group photo?
> - idea: consider screen snap to showcase application

done: https://www.osgeo.org/projects/geohealthcheck/

> - idea: consider "migrate from" to help position product
>
> 1) geospatial
> baseline:
> - README
> community:
> - website: https://geohealthcheck.org
> - communication: gitter (open to everyone, but no archive)
>
> 2) open source
> baseline:
> - LICENSE - MIT License, looks great, can consider markdown if you like
> community:
> - headers: code looks great, tests have headers as well. checking data (nothing looks like raw data here - if so we would of used a README)

Added a README for good measure anyway:
https://github.com/geopython/GeoHealthCheck/tree/master/tests/data

> - checking bash / config scripts since they are often missed...
> https://github.com/geopython/GeoHealthCheck/blob/master/Dockerfile <-- check out what yjacolin wanted to use for license
>

Asked Yves for clarification in
https://github.com/geopython/GeoHealthCheck/issues/275

> For the above this "technically" is part of the distribution of geohealthcheck and not part of the running project code. So it is polite to check, but does not affect the license of geohealthcheck.
>
> 3) participatory
> baseline:
> contributing.md - not present, but I do see pull-requests. Recommend adding contributing.md if you get a chance

https://github.com/geopython/GeoHealthCheck/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

> community:
> - showing contributions being accepted - lots of variety here (including translations)
> - issue tracker shows healthy use
> - bonus: not on osgeo live (yet)
>
> 4) new requirements
>
> Code of conduct  - nope

https://github.com/geopython/GeoHealthCheck/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

> todo:  please have one (wizard available)
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 12:57, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just double checking if geohealthcheck is a community project (it shows up as such on the website but I am not sure we have a record ...). The project is really gearing up and would like to set up an email list...
>>
>> Tom is here and would like to "formally" apply for OSGeo community, will reply shortly with our notes.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator