[Incubator] motion: wradlib application / community module
Kai Muehlbauer
kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de
Wed Feb 20 22:43:50 PST 2019
Thanks for the feedback and your additions!
It seems that I unintentionally used my author super powers to publish
the project. And yes, if you think we are ready for the code
review/motion, please start it.
- Kai
Am 21.02.19 um 01:15 schrieb Jody Garnett:
> Nice, it looked to be already published:
>
>
> My own notes on https://www.osgeo.org/projects/wradlib/
> - Fun and cheerful logo :)
> - I changed the project type from "OSGeo Community" to "None" (we need
> to review the code and make a motion before OSGeo will recognize the
> project). If you like we can start that review that process now in a new
> email thread.
> - great website with extensive tutorial material
> - I found an image from your website to use as a screen snap (it really
> helps to show potential users *anything*)
> - Added developer links to source code and issue tracker
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:52 AM Kai Muehlbauer
> <kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I think the page is finished from our side.
>
> https://www.osgeo.org/projects/wradlib/
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
> Am 14.02.19 um 08:41 schrieb Jody Garnett:
> > Perfect adding you as a project author now; let someone on this list
> > know when your draft is ready and we can publish.
> > --
> > Jody Garnett
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 23:33, Kai Muehlbauer
> <kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>
> > <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de
> <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the pointers, Jody! I totally agree, that this osgeo
> > community program would be an easier way to start with.
> >
> > I just flicked through your presentation and I really like to
> start with
> > the creation of the project page. Since we already conform
> with osgeo in
> > terms of LICENSE/CONTRIBUTING I should ask for the "project
> author"
> > role. Just tested the login, works. My user name is "kmuehlbauer".
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > - Kai
> >
> > Am 14.02.19 um 08:01 schrieb Jody Garnett:
> > > Thanks Kai, as indicated this osgeo community program does not
> > require a
> > > mentor and may be an easier way to get started at osgeo.
> > >
> > > There is some details on the website
> > > <https://www.osgeo.org/about/committees/incubation/> and in
> > > presentations
> > >
> >
> <https://www.slideshare.net/jgarnett/open-source-practice-and-passion-at-osgeo>,
> > > and we are happy to answer any questions.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:05 AM Kai Muehlbauer
> > > <kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de
> <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>
> <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>>
> > <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de
> <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>
> > <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de
> <mailto:kai.muehlbauer at uni-bonn.de>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > I'm Kai one of the wradlib developers and I'm referring
> to the
> > recent
> > > update on ticket:
> > > https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1644
> > >
> > > and the reference on this list here:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2019-February/003773.html
> > >
> > > Much has happened in the recent 3 years. For sure, you'll
> > notice that we
> > > made the step over release wradlib 1.0.
> > > https://wradlib.org/2018/04/wradlib_release_1_0_0/ to
> the current
> > > wradlib is at version 1.2.
> > >
> > > The user base is growing as the questions on the
> wradlib-users
> > list
> > > indicate.
> > >
> > > So, yes we are happy to discuss osgeo community program as
> > proposed in
> > > the ticket comment.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kai
> > >
> > > Am 30.08.16 um 12:40 schrieb Maik Heistermann:
> > > > Dear colleagues,
> > > >
> > > > I am Maik, one of the wradlib developers. I certainly
> do not
> > want to
> > > > interfer with your internal discussion. I just noticed
> Bruce
> > > Bannerman's
> > > > message, and I would like to briefly respond in order to
> > maybe clarify
> > > > one or two issues.
> > > >
> > > > First of all, thank you very much for considering this
> request,
> > > and also
> > > > for sharing your concerns.
> > > >
> > > > However, the ideas outlined in the mentioned GRASS wiki
> > article [1]
> > > > relate to the analysis of SAR images (airborne or
> spaceborn)
> > which are
> > > > concerned with the radar-based exploration of the
> earth surface.
> > > > wradlib, in contrast, is concerned with the analysis of
> > weather radar
> > > > observations for exploring atmosperic properties (mostly
> > rainfall)
> > > in 2
> > > > or 3 dimensions. The underlying analytical framework
> differs
> > in wide
> > > > parts as we need to understand the propagation of the
> radar beam
> > > and its
> > > > interaction with the atmosphere. The target variables
> (e.g.
> > > > precipitation intensity, wind speed, state of matter)
> > > fundamentally differ.
> > > >
> > > > I fully agree to avoid re-inventing the wheel. wradlib was
> > in fact
> > > > motivated by that very ambition. To my knowledge, it
> was the
> > first
> > > > published Open Source effort to this end. Meanwhile, other
> > Open Source
> > > > packages ([2], [3]) have been published, and we are
> closely
> > > cooperating
> > > > with these projects in order to enhance
> inter-operability and
> > > > harmonisation [4].
> > > >
> > > > Still, wradlib tries to build on existing packages as
> good as
> > > possible,
> > > > so we make in fact heavy usage of gdal for georeferencing
> > and raster
> > > > processing, but also of e.g. numpy, scipy, netcdf4 and
> h5py.
> > > >
> > > > I hope this response helps to better understand the
> > rationale behind
> > > > wradlib. Again, I would like to thank you for taking
> the time to
> > > > scrutinize our request to become an OSGeo community
> project.
> > I am
> > > > looking forward to your decisio
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=d+to+your+decisio&entry=gmail&source=g>n.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Maik
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Radar_data_processing
> > > > [2] http://arm-doe.github.io/pyart/
> > > > [3] http://git.baltrad.eu/
> > > > [4] http://openradar.github.io/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Incubator mailing list
> > > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>>
> > <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>>>
> > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
> > >
> >
More information about the Incubator
mailing list