[iTowns-dev] Video in repo

[Thomas Broyer]

Instead of removing gh-pages altogether (unless there's a good reason to do
so), couldn't we change the auto-deploy script to force-push?

Otherwise sounds good (the old files I recalled of were in resources/
https://github.com/iTowns/itowns2/commit/95bf265e33923c0a8e45b06558160e76f414e00d
)

Le 3 juil. 2017 7:13 PM, "Augustin Trancart" <augustin.trancart at oslandia.com>
a écrit :

To be more precise: a prerequisite for this is to manage to upload our docs
to
itowns.github.io. Pepp and I are currently working on this.

Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
augustin.trancart at oslandia.com

On 03/07/2017 19:06, Augustin Trancart wrote:
> Ok so, I intent to drastically reduce the size of the repo by removing
from its
> history the branches:
> - gh-pages (only when deploy to itowns.github.io will work)
> - gh-master
>
> and the files:
> - dist/* (will be partly done by removal of gh-pages)
> - build/*
> - data/*
> - resources/*
> - doc/*
> - src/Core/Commander/Providers/Potree/workers.js (and actually maybe
Potree/
> directly)
> - src/ThirdParty
> - examples/gpx/ULTRA2009.gpx
> - API_Doc/ (should be done by removal of gh-pages)
>
> This implies a force-push on *all* the branches. Therefore, it is advised
that
> you *clone the repo back once it's done*. You'll probably need to
resubmit your
> PR. I can help for the rebase if necessary.
>
> I'll keep a copy of the repo just in case :-)
>
> Schedule: TOMORROW!
>
> If you see something wrong in this, please raise your hand !
>
> Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
> augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>
> PS: FYI, when aggressively testing locally, I reduce the repo size from
103Mb to
> 3.9MB.
>
> On 29/06/2017 15:56, Augustin Trancart wrote:
>> Ok, so I continued my investigation, and apart from this video, the size
of the
>> repo is also big because of the dist folder we commit to gh-pages at each
>> merge... I'm pretty sure that does count more than the video itself
(which
>> shouldn't take more than it's compressed raw size, as it has not been
changed
>> since its appearance). And I don't really know how to workaround that.
>>
>> So I'm not sure it is worthy to rewrite the entire history for gaining
just 20mb
>> (max) of our 110mb repo any more. Maybe we should just live with it, as
only the
>> first clone is slow.
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
>> augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>>
>> On 29/06/2017 14:26, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-06-29 13:51 GMT+02:00 Augustin Trancart <
augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>>> <mailto:augustin.trancart at oslandia.com>>:
>>>
>>>     I basically trust maintainer not to merge big files,
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, you mean like for that video file? :troll:
>>>
>>>
>>>     but yes, if we can automate it, it's even better.
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that apparently aabc913 didn't went through a pull request, so we
couldn't
>>> have prevented it anyway (Travis could have failed, and then a
push-force would
>>> have been needed anyway)
>>>
>>> Cordialement,
>>> --
>>> Thomas Broyer
>>> Atol Conseils et Développements
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> iTowns-dev mailing list
>> iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iTowns-dev mailing list
> iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
>


_______________________________________________
iTowns-dev mailing list
iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/itowns-dev/attachments/20170703/d72a091e/attachment.html>