[Java-collab] So how is this list doing? Are we on topic...

[Sunburned Surveyor]

I think the list has been a success so far, and I am please with the
number of subscribers and participants.

Jody wrote: "It would save me time and effort to have java-collab as a
venue for working out compatibility problems; would that be a good use
of this list?"

I think that is a purpose for which the list was intended in the first place.

The Sunburned Surveyor

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Jody Garnett <jgarnett at refractions.net> wrote:
> So how are we doing for staying on topic? A couple things have been really
> successful:
> - introductions all around
> - learning about new work (and duplicated work)
>
> And a couple tracks (on and off list) where we could improve:
> - yesterday I was sorting out a compatibility problem between uDig and
> Deegree; and signing up to deegree-devel and posting follow up email on
> udig-devel etc...
> - The ISO19115/ISO19111 discussion is starting to span multiple lists -
> CCing java-collab; and geoserver-devel; and geotools-devel
>
> It would save me time and effort to have java-collab as a venue for working
> out compatibility problems; would that be a good use of this list?
> I think the ISO19115/ISO1911 discussion started off okay; but as the
> discussion got specific, and importantly additional lists were CCed, it was
> hard for others to take part.
>
> Please note if you CC a developer list (other than java-collab) others will
> not smoothly be able to reply to the message; and it becomes a pain for all
> involved.
> Jody
> _______________________________________________
> Java-collab mailing list
> Java-collab at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/java-collab
>