[Liblas-devel] Re: Can't use dotnetLibLAS because liblas1.dll
is missing.
Jenn
jrobinson at mdacorporation.com
Wed Jun 9 20:23:01 EDT 2010
Howard Butler <hobu.inc at ...> writes:
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
>
> > I think I will rename these to liblas.dll and liblas_c.dll, however, to
eliminate any ambiguity.
>
> This has now been done for the WIN32 build type in the cmake configuration.
Since the next version of libLAS
> is to be called 1.6.0, should we be fully versioning these (ala liblas-
1.6.0.dll
and liblas_c-1.6.0.dll)?
>
> Howard
>
I have the same problem.
Even if I update the C# code to use "liblas_c.dll"
(which seems to be the only dll generated), I still get the "Unable to
load DLL 'liblas_c.dll'" exception.
Could you please add some additional detail to your compilation instructions
saying which files to use, and where to put them once the build is successful?
Thanks,
Jenn
More information about the Liblas-devel
mailing list