[mapguide-internals] Raster provider problems...
Traian Stanev
traian.stanev at autodesk.com
Sat Apr 7 13:09:12 EDT 2007
Yes I understand all that.
But mostly working is way better than none at all. That's all I was trying to say.
That, or every request for a raster -- even for formats that would work fine -- will have to pass through the same critical section in order to synchronize access. I wouldn't call that an enterprise class solution either.
Traian
-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Frank Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Sat 4/7/2007 12:40 PM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Cc:
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Raster provider problems...
Traian Stanev wrote:
> I think it's worth it to just change the capability to per-connection-threaded and see what happens.
> Seems like we need experimental verification.
Traian,
I'm not sure what you mean by experimental verification. Are you hoping
to verify that it works in per-connection-threading? Of course, it mostly
will. But "mostly" is a pretty weak position to take for enterprise class
software.
You really can't experimentally prove that software is threadsafe. At
mostly you can prove it isn't.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org <http://osgeo.org/>
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
More information about the mapguide-internals
mailing list