[mapguide-internals]MapGuideRFC19-ConcurrentFDOproviderconnections

[Paul Spencer]

+0 Paul

I think it is important, but this is essentially a hack to make  
things work and doesn't address the actual underlying problem.

Also, using the proposed syntax, how will multiple restrictions be  
handled?  The example just shows a single provider but it is  
important to show how multiples could be specified.

Cheers

Paul

On 18-Apr-07, at 2:04 PM, Jason Birch wrote:

> I'm going to consider that a motion for an accelerated vote on RFC 19.
>
> Given the importance of this RFC, I support this motion (seconded) and
> vote +1
>
> Jason :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce
> Dechant
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:55
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE:
> [mapguide-internals]MapGuideRFC19-ConcurrentFDOproviderconnections
>
> Any objections to me posting this for approval sooner then after the
> typical week of discussion?
>
> I would like to get it into the MGOS 1.2 Beta 2.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer                          pspencer at dmsolutions.ca    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Chief Technology Officer                                         |
|DM Solutions Group Inc                http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+