[mapguide-internals] Drupal vs Trac
Robert Bray
rbray at robertbray.net
Mon Feb 12 13:08:16 EST 2007
OK thanks Frank and Jason, makes perfect sense. In fact that was my
original intention when I coined the Trac instance "MapGuide Internals".
Then of course I starting out-thinking myself :)
Bob
Jason Birch wrote:
> I'd prefer that the content related to development (RFC's, Bug
> submission guidelines, etc) be maintained on the Trac site and linked to
> directly from the Drupal menus.
>
> I see the same kind of functional break between the sites that Frank
> notes. My main problem with moving the content to Drupal is that it
> breaks the "integratedness" of using Trac as a development tool. Users
> that come to the Trac site would have to go back to Drupal to read bug
> submission guidelines, and then come back again to Trac.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert
> Bray
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 08:50
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Drupal vs Trac
>
> Anyone have any thoughts as to what content should go into the Trac Wiki
> vs Drupal? I currently have the Bug Submission guidelines on the Trac
> Wiki and we have been moving RFCs there. However all of this could be
> Drupal content, which might make it all a bit more integrated into the
> main site, common search functions, etc.
>
> Another consideration is that under Drupal the content can be localized,
> not sure this is true under Trac. I don't see us localizing RFCs, but
> the bug submission guidelines probably should be.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
More information about the mapguide-internals
mailing list