[mapguide-internals] RFC 14
tom.fukushima at autodesk.com
Mon Feb 12 18:41:45 EST 2007
Re: "no attributes in the schema": At the time, if I recall correctly,
we decided to go with elements exclusively for consistency and because
there were recommendations by sources to avoid using attributes (a
search of the web will provide lots of hits on this).
As, for Ben's concern of where some elements depend on others, elements
could also be used in place of attributes here, and Ben's good
suggestion will still work.
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:09 PM
To: mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RFC 14
SYMBOLIZATON SCHEMA - DEPENDENT ELEMENTS
So far we have avoided use of attributes in the map and layer
definitions. This just keeps with the tradition -- does anyone know the
reason for that anyway? If not, we can consider changing some elements
to be attributes.
More information about the mapguide-internals