[mapguide-internals] FW: [mapguide-users] Mapguide 2.0 Beta1 vs 1.2 performance

[Paul Spencer]

Anyone else have a feeling for relative performance of 1.2 vs 2.0 vs  
2.0 w/ Fusion?  I saw it installed on a laptop yesterday, running full  
screen with no tiling and the Sheboygan sample, and it was panning and  
zooming in milliseconds (there was barely a flash).  Everything was on  
the same machine, so there was no network latency.

Note that Fusion, in particular, is probably not optimized for initial  
load in this beta.  But run-time performance should be at least on par  
with the 2.0 default viewer.

Cheers

Paul

On 21-Nov-07, at 4:34 AM, Jason Birch wrote:

> In case there are folks on Internals that aren't watching Users...
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Bruno Scott
> Subject: [mapguide-users] Mapguide 2.0 Beta1 vs 1.2 performance
>
> I have 2 identical vm-ware with windows 2003 running on the same  
> machine
> I start one of the vm-ware, I do the testing, I stop it and then  
> start the
> other to do the other bench Bench is done on the sheboygan sample at  
> 1:5000
> scale
>
>        MG 2.0 with fusion              Mg 2.0 without  
> fusion           Mg 1.2
>
> pan     29 sec                  12 sec                          2 sec
>
> select  28 sec                  12 sec                          2 sec
>
>
> I know it's only a beta but why is that slow?
>
> Bruno Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer                          pspencer at dmsolutions.ca    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Chief Technology Officer                                         |
|DM Solutions Group Inc                http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+