[mapguide-internals] Sandbox request for RFC71

[Jason Birch]

Seems like a just and noble cause. :)

I'd suggest putting it under rfc71 directly rather than nested under your uname. 

Could you please update the wiki when you create it?

Jason


----- Original Message -----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org <mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Mon Aug 03 09:50:46 2009
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Sandbox request for RFC71


Hi All,

I forsee disruptive and destabilising changes if I implement RFC71 directly
against the trunk. So with that in mind, I would like to request a sandbox
where I can make incremental changes without major disruption.

Details:

name: jng/rfc71
access: jng (at the moment)
description: development work on RFC 71
sandboxed content:
  - MgDev\Web\src\mapviewerphp
  - MgDev\Web\src\mapviewernet
  - MgDev\Web\src\mapviewerjava
  - MgDev\Web\src\viewerfiles
  - MgDev\Web\src\stdicons
  - MgDev\Web\src\localized

Regards,

- Jackie

P.S. I have a working first cut implementation for the PHP viewer. Looking
pretty good. Just afraid to commit it against trunk :-)

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Sandbox-request-for-RFC71-tp3379006p3379006.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals