[mapguide-internals] RFC 81 is ready for review

[Buddy Hu]

Hi Kenneth, Thanks for your reply!

About the overlap with RFC 71, I think we don't make any changes to the existing Selection Panel. If Jackie want to introduce the Selection Panel to the AJAX view, I am pleasure to see this happens. If not, I think the Feature Inspector panel will cover some functionalities of the Selection Panel.

For the typo of "Inverse Selection", I will update it later. Thanks for your good catch.

And I don't think we need any server or Webserver code changes for this RFC. I will clarify these in the "Implications" part.

And I'm not intent to support the sort or filter for the properties now.

For the Gzip, we get this suggestion from Paul Spencer. I didn't do any test for this yet. For more details, you can check the mail I attached.

Thanks for your reply again! I will update my RFC and post it again.

-Buddy


-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:04 PM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RFC 81 is ready for review

This overlaps a bit with RFC 71:
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71

At least the tree for display in the AJAX viewer should be present 
there, and I belive Jackie has developed this already?

There is a slight spelling error in the "Inverse selection" menu item.

Are there any changes required in the server code, or is this done with 
the current selection system?

There has been questions about the order of properties, some want them 
sorted, some want them as is, will there be an option to select sort modus?

To use GZip compression, is it possible to just serve the .gz file or 
does it require a webserver change to supply the compression header?
I seem to recal that some browsers do not support GZip compression, and 
the served file should obey the compression flag to ensure compatibility.

If a webserver change is required, will the change include maintenance 
for the installer?

The test plan should include testing with a range of browsers.

I am overall positive, the preview looks cool, and the addition is 
sorely needed.

Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S



Buddy Hu skrev:
> Hi All,
>
> The RFC 81- Add a new widget Feature Inspector is ok for review. http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc81
> Any comments will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> -Buddy Hu
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>   
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals